Note
The Funtoo Linux project has transitioned to "Hobby Mode" and this wiki is now read-only.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amd64-bulldozer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But `cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86` doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include micro...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But | I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But <code>cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86</code> doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include microcode that the CPU doesn't actually support? | ||
Maybe it would be better to tell the readers to refer to http://www.funtoo.org/News:CPU_FLAGS_X86 for optimization? | Maybe it would be better to tell the readers to refer to http://www.funtoo.org/News:CPU_FLAGS_X86 for optimization? | ||
Latest revision as of 08:51, March 20, 2015
I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include microcode that the CPU doesn't actually support?
Maybe it would be better to tell the readers to refer to http://www.funtoo.org/News:CPU_FLAGS_X86 for optimization?